Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement

When you discuss a topic and everyone agrees, the conversation often dies out quickly. But when you disagree, you’re putting yourself in opposition to what was said and the discussion continues. Paul Graham, a computer engineer, therefore proposed a “Hierarchy of Disagreement” in 2008. Learn at which level you are able to articulate your disagreement. Hopefully it’s not just name-calling or responding to tone.

Go to Patreon and join our efforts to educate teachers and others on how to communicate better:
https://www.patreon.com/sprouts

下載沒有廣告和背景音樂的視頻🤫

視頻課程

註冊我們的郵件列表，不要錯過我們的新視頻🔔:
http://eeurl.com/dNU4BQ

資源和教學資源🎓:

Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement

訪問我們的網站 :
www.sproutsschools.com

CONTRIBUTE by upvoting your favorite topic or suggesting new ones :
https://sprouts.featureupvote.com/

感謝我們的顧客
這個視頻是在我們的讚助人的支持下製作的: 安德里亞·巴西利奧·拉瓦, 安吉拉, ArkiTechy, Artur, 巴德拉, Brilliant Minds Learning, Cedric.Wang, 大衛·馬卡姆, Delandric Webb, 丹尼斯克勞斯, Digital INnov8ors, 博士. Matthias Müller-Mellin, Duane Bemister, 以斯帖·蔣, 伊娃·瑪麗·科布林, Floris Devreese, Frari63, 蓋茨比 Dkdc, 姜, ICH KANN DEUTSCH UND ES WAR EINFACH!, Isabelle, Jana Heinze, Jannes Kroon, 杰弗裡·卡西安娜, Joanne Doyle, 約翰·克拉森, John Burghardt, 喬納森·施瓦茨, Jorge Luis Mejia Velazquez, Karen Lewis, Kenneth Natvig, Leonel, Liskaya, Marcel, Marco VanGuff, 瑪麗亞, 馬克短, 馬蒂斯努, Matthias Ruck, Mezes.Macko, Mindozone, Mique XO, 穆罕默德·胡馬雍, 尼基, Okan Elibol, Paul Hopkins, Peter Bishop, Petra, 雷蒙德藤岡, Robert Cook, scripz, Sebastian Huaytan Meder, Si, Stefan Gros, 斯蒂芬, Stephen Clark, Stuart Bishop, 蘇珊舒斯特, 泰蒂亞娜·格拉西莫娃, The Freudian Centre, Tristan Scifo, Victor Paweletz, 沃爾夫岡·沃爾霍斯特, Yohanan Schwartzman, Yvonne Clapham and all the others.Thank you! 要加入他們，請訪問 www.patreon.com/sprots

合作者
腳本: 喬納斯·科布林
腳本編輯器: Morgan Lizop
藝術家: 帕斯卡爾·加傑利
語音: 馬特·雅培
染色: 那琳
編輯: Peera Lertsukittipongsa
生產: 賽琳娜巴多爾
聲音設計: 米格爾·奧赫達

原聲帶
Nice Toy – 樂巴士工作室
Guilty Pleasures – Olive Musique

DIG DEEPER with these top videos and articles:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophistical_Refutations

來源
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory/Basic-tenets-of-critical-race-theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)#Graham’s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement
http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html

QUOTES: WHO SAID WHAT?
“Abortion is legal because babies can’t vote” — Joseph Bonkowski
“No woman can call herself free who does not control her own body” — Margaret Sanger
“Race and skin color are socially constructed, not biologically natural.” — 1st tenet, Critical Race Theory
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” — George Orwell

課堂練習
Visit our website to find out about suggested classroom activities!

CHAPTER
00:00 Opening quotes and statement
00:52 介紹
01:19 Graham’s hierarchy of disagreement
01:32 等級 1: Name-calling
01:48 等級 2: Ad hominem
02:14 等級 3: Responding to tone
02:41 等級 4: Contradiction
03:08 等級 5: Counterargument
03:41 等級 6: Refutation
04:13 等級 7: Refuting the central point
05:05 Benefit of knowing the form of argument
06:06 What do you think?
06:58 Patrons credits
07:07 結尾

#disagreement #communication #sproutslearning #paulgraham #hierarchyofdisagreements